E7300 Vs E5200 Vs X2 6000 Vs E4700 Vs X3 8750

[evilution]

Tweet

lgsg aja ya

kutipan dari http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...pdc-e5200.html

As a result, the complete list of hardware we used to built our testbed looked as follows:

• CPUs:
  • AMD Phenom X3 8750 (Socket AM2+, 2.4GHz, 3 x 512KB L2, 2MB L3, Toliman);
  • AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Socket AM2, 3.1GHz, 2 x 512KB L2, Brisbane);
  • Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 (LGA775, 2.66GHz, 1333MHz FSB, 6MB L2, Wolfdale);
  • Intel Core 2 Duo E7300 (LGA775, 2.66GHz, 1067MHz FSB, 3MB L2, Wolfdale-3M);
  • Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 (LGA775, 2.53GHz, 1067MHz FSB, 3MB L2, Wolfdale-3M);
  • Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 (LGA775, 2.6GHz, 800MHz FSB, 2MB L2, Allendale);
  • Intel Pentium DC E5200 (LGA775, 2.5GHz, 800MHz FSB, 2MB L2, Wolfdale-2M);
  • Intel Pentium DC E2220 (LGA775, 2.4GHz, 800MHz FSB, 1MB L2, Allendale).
• Mainboards:
  • DFI LANPARTY DK P45-T2RS (LGA775, Intel P45, DDR2 SDRAM);
  • ASUS M3A32-MVP Deluxe (Socket AM2+, AMD 790FX).
• Memory: 2GB DDR2-800 SDRAM with 4-4-4-12 timings (Corsair Dominator TWIN2X2048-10000C5DF).
• Graphics card: OCZ GeForce 8800GTX (PCI-E x16).
• HDD: Western Digital WD1500AHFD (SATA150).
• OS: Microsoft Windows Vista x86.

GAME BENCH



Processor bus frequency and L2 cache memory matter a lot for the CPU performance in games. Therefore, any limitation on the original core functionality immediately slows down the gaming performance. As we can see, Core 2 Duo E7300 is far behind Core 2 Duo E8200, and Pentium DC E5200 is noticeably slower than Core 2 Duo E7200 even though these processor pairs work at similar clock speeds and use cores from the same Wolfdale family. As a result, Athlon 64 X2 6000+ competes successfully against Pentium DC E5200. However, Phenom X3 8750 proves fast only in Unreal Tournament 3 that knows to take advantage of triple-core CPU architecture.

Two Sides to the Picture: Performance and Price

The user’s buying inexpensive processors like Core 2 Duo E7300 and Pentium Dual-Core E5200 reviewed today, rarely rely only on their performance when making a buying decision. Trying to do the right thing they also pay due attention to the price point. Therefore, we decided to go past traditional performance benchmarks and provide an additional chart illustrating the price-to-performance ratio of the today’s testing participants. Especially since we have just tested almost all contemporary processors price between $80 and $160.
The diagram below contains all the official CPU pricing. Note that the current retail prices are not that much different from the official recommended prices, so they will hardly affect the conclusion.




You see right away that the price of mainstream processors grows much faster than their performance. For instance, Core 2 Duo E8200 costs twice as much as Pentium DC E5200, but the performance difference between them is no bigger than 20%. It is so, because clock frequency still remains the primary factor affecting the performance within a family on the same microarchitecture. All Intel processors from the price range in question fall into the frequency interval from 2.4GHz to 2.66GHz. Intel’s attempts to change the CPU speed by changing the bus frequency or the size of L2 cache turn out not so efficient. So, looks like one of the cheapest processors, Pentium DC E5200, currently offers the best price-to-performance combination.
As for AMD processors, the company definitely needs to revise their pricing now that Intel launched another set of inexpensive processor modifications. For example, AMD Athlon X2 6000+ can’t offer the same attractive consumer functionality as Pentium DC E5200. However, the triple-core Phenom X3 8750 looks very good here. AMD chose the right strategy for promoting Phenom X3 as an alternative to mainstream dual-core competition. This seems to be the right role for Phenom X3 8750.



Sori cm bs copas
keknya beralih ke Intel ne,,,nunggu Kuma?? hmm,,,,,

[dewa4569]

Tweet

hmmm... bagus juga reviewnya.
Jadi temen2 bisa milih mana yang terbaik. rasanya si masi worthed E7300 klo Intel. Klo AMD masi X3 8750.

[phenominside]

Tweet

kalo gau seh lebih vote AMD Phenom X3 8750 (Socket AM2+, 2.4GHz, 3 x 512KB L2, 2MB L3, Toliman);
coz dia udah 3 core,semakin fungsi procesing multitread juga semakin baik dibanding dual core ok

[BoYs DoNt CrY]

Tweet

Yaaa,,,, Begitulah,,, Intel sedang diatas angin,,, Itu belum yang seri Quad Core nya,,,,,

[Weqs]

Tweet

core 2 duo emang gag da mati nya bro

[Everglide]

Tweet

masih lebih worth beli x2 6000+ daripada E2220 yah ternyata..
setelah saya cek harganya, keduanya beda tipis banget, tapi performanya menang x2 6000+

tapi sebaliknya, lebih baik membeli E7300 daripada x3 8750, harga E7300 lebih murah, dan overall masih diatas x3 8750
bisa jadi referensi nih buat temen saya yg mau rakit komputer

[AMD minded]

Tweet

whehehe, 2 AMD dikeroyok pasukan intel

at least dari review ini gw jadi makin mantep, belum saatnya ganti CPU selama Brisbane gw masih bisa di push ke 3,1 -3,2 GHz. Coz, kalo ganti ke X3, otomatis ganti mobo, ganti ke intel 7xxx, so pasti ganti mobo.

total buat proc+mobonya kalo gw ganti sekitar 2-2,5 jt, kayanya mending gw alokasikan ke SLI 2x9600GT dulu deh, biar proc cuma Brisbane ntar di game hajar ke res 1600x1200 16xAA (walah, lupa, 800k lagi buat PSU ) beratttt.....

(maap kalo aga curhat dikit )

[phenominside]

Tweet

kalem boss pasukan amd is coming.
phenom II dah di depan mata,intel siap2 aja diasepin hahaha.peace boss

[antire]

Tweet

^^^
yoi2, setuju dah gw...
gak sbar nyicip Phenom II...

[evilution]

Tweet

tenang saya pake AMD tp mulai ke intel wkwkkw...ttp maju buat AMD

yup kl dari konsumsi power bs d liat d tabel y sob





yup E uda mengadopsi 45nm sedangkan AMD masi mengadopsi 65nm...maka butuh power yg lbih besar lain halnya y kl phenom II kluar