Perbandingan Performa E4300, E5200, E6600, Q6600 dan E8500
Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the CHIP Forum.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 96

Thread: Perbandingan Performa E4300, E5200, E6600, Q6600 dan E8500
  
Bookmark and Share

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Jakarta
    Posts
    768
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    15

    Perbandingan Performa E4300, E5200, E6600, Q6600 & E8500 Serta Pengaruh Ukuran Cache



    Tadinya sekedar menjawab rasa penasaran saya tentang kinerja E5200, setelah googling ternyata dapet. Jadi untuk berbagi informasi aja dengan member chip yang lain, saya buat thread ini, semoga berguna

    Pengujian menggunakan :

    Asus P5E X38 with bios 903.
    2x1Gb Crucial Ballistix PC2 8500.
    Zotac 8800GT @701/1836/1950
    Creative X-Fi Extreme Gamer
    Zalman ZM750-HP Psu.
    Seagate 7200.10 320Gb sata2 hdd
    Samsung 20x DL DVDRW
    TT Aluminium Armour.
    High end watercooling setup.
    178.13 WHQL driver.
    8.09.04 Physx driver.
    Windows XP Home SP3.

    Pengujian yang dilakukan :
    3Dmark 01, 03, 05 and 06. Default settings.
    Aquamark 3. Default settings.
    Super Pi 1m, 16m and 32m.
    Nuclear MC. Default settings.
    Cinebench R10. Default settings.
    Fluidmark v1.00. 1280x1024, Default settings.
    Lightsmark 2007. 1280x1024 Default settings.
    Company of Heroes Opposing fronts in built test. 1280x1024, all set to high or
    Ultra where available and 8x AA.
    World in Conflict. Built in test. 1280x1024, high no AA.
    Crysis. Crysis benchmark tool, all high no AA, 1280x1024.
    Far Cry. Hardware OC Benchmark. 1280x1024, default settings.
    Prey. Hardware OC Benchmark. 1280x1024, default settings.

    Semua tes dilakukan sebanyak 3 kali, dan diambil nilai rata-ratanya.

    ini hasilnya









    Sumber : http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/sho...php?t=17929621

    Biar tambah seru, ditambahin nih, pengaruh ukuran cache prosesor (ngambil dari reviewnya Om TOM)

    Plattform
    CPU I Intel Pentium Dual Core E2160 (65nm; 1200 MHz, 1 MB L2 Cache)
    clocked at 2.4 GHz (266 MHz x9)
    CPU II Intel Core 2 Duo E4400 (65nm; 2000 MHz, 2 MB L2 Cache)
    clocked at 2.4 GHz (266 MHz x9)
    CPU III Intel Core 2 Duo X6800 (65nm; 3000 MHz, 4 MB L2 Cache)
    clocked at 2.4 GHz (266 MHz x9)
    Motherboard ASUS Blitz Formula, Rev: 1.0
    Chipset: Intel P35, BIOS 1101
    RAM Corsair CM2X1024-888C4D
    2x 1024 MB DDR2-800 (CL 4-4-4-12 2T)
    Hard Disk Drive Western Digital Raptor WD1500ADFD
    150 GB, 10.000 RPM, 16 MB cache, SATA/150
    DVD-ROM Samsung SH-S183
    Graphics Card Zotac Geforce 8800 GTS
    GPU: Geforce 8800 GTS (500 MHz)
    RAM: 320 MB GDDR3 (1600 MHz)
    Sound Card Integrated
    Power Supply Enermax EG565P-VE
    ATX 2.01, 510 Watt

    System Software & Drivers
    OS Windows XP Professional 5.10.2600, Service Pack 2
    DirectX Version 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904)
    Platform Drivers Intel Version 8.3.1013
    Graphics Drivers Nvidia Forceware 162.18

    Benchmarks and Settings
    3D-Games
    Call Of Duty 2 Version: 1.3 Retail
    Video Mode: 1280x960
    Anti Aliasing: off
    Graphics Card: medium
    Timedemo demo2
    Prey Version: 1.3
    Video Mode: 1280x1024
    Video Quality: game default
    Vsync = off
    Benchmark: THG-Demo
    Quake 4 Version: 1.2 (Dual-Core Patch)
    Video Mode: 1280x1024
    Video Quality: high
    THG Timedemo waste.map
    timedemo demo8.demo 1 (1 = load textures)
    Audio
    Lame MP3 Version 3.98 Beta 5
    Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min
    wave to mp3
    160 kbps
    Video
    TMPEG 3.0 Express Version: 3.0.4.24 (no Audio)
    fist 5 Minutes DVD Terminator 2 SE (704x576) 16:9
    Multithreading by rendering
    DivX 6.6 Version: 6.6 (4 Logical CPUs)
    Profile: High Definition Profile
    1-pass, 3000 kbit/s
    Encoding mode: Insane Quality
    Enhanced multithreading
    no Audio
    XviD 1.1.3 Version: 1.1.3
    Target qantizer: 1.00
    Mainconcept H.264 v2 Version 2.1
    260 MB MPEG-2 source (1920x1080) 16:9
    Codec: H.264
    Mode: NTSC
    Audio: AAC
    Profile: High
    Stream: Program
    Applications
    Winrar Version 3.70
    (303 MB, 47 Files, 2 Folders)
    Compression = Best
    Dictionary = 4096 kB
    Autodesk 3D Studio Max Version: 8.0
    Characters "Dragon_Charater_rig"
    rendering HTDV 1920x1080
    Cinebench Version: R10
    1 CPU, x CPU run
    Synthetics
    PCMark05 Pro Version: 1.2.0
    CPU and Memory Tests
    Windows Media Player 10.00.00.3646
    Windows Media Encoder 9.00.00.2980

    Benchmark Result

    Game Benchmarks







    Sumber : http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...tter,1709.html
    Last edited by keaton; 06-02-2009 at 09:33. Reason: Adding new review
    Pengen tau jeroan Smartphone anda?? atau ada rencana pengen beli smartphone?? mampir sini yaaa
    http://forum.chip.co.id/pda-mobile-p...ml#post3229882

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    dibawah pohon rindang
    Posts
    6,450
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    56

    Re: Perbandingan Performa E4300, E5200, E6600, Q6600 dan E8500



    nice info pak....
    rupanya pada OC 3.0, 4300 masih bersaing kuat dengan yang lainnya
    cendol sent
    Just my2 ¢



    "Satu alasan mengapa anjing begitu menghibur
    ketika Anda sedih; karena ia tidak berusaha mencari tahu
    mengapa Anda sedih"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Jakarta
    Posts
    768
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: Perbandingan Performa E4300, E5200, E6600, Q6600 dan E8500



    Lanjutan :

    Aplication Benchmarks





    Audio & Video Benchmarks









    Synthetic Benchmark









    Sumber : http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...tter,1709.html
    Last edited by keaton; 06-02-2009 at 10:00. Reason: adding new review

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Bekasi - Semarang
    Posts
    1,286
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    27

    Re: Perbandingan Performa E4300, E5200, E6600, Q6600 dan E8500



    Wah nice review bro, tapi ko hasil benchmark proc E8500 nya cuma satu ya, padahal gw pake itu, pen tau kemampuan optimalnya . . .

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Jakarta
    Posts
    2,143
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Perbandingan Performa E4300, E5200, E6600, Q6600 dan E8500



    Mantap mantap reviewnya!!!
    bisa jadi masukkan

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    under the neath
    Posts
    186
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    7

    Re: Perbandingan Performa E4300, E5200, E6600, Q6600 dan E8500



    bahan masukan yang bagus
    GRP for u

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    City Of Heroes
    Posts
    773
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Perbandingan Performa E4300, E5200, E6600, Q6600 dan E8500



    mantabs deh inponya bro... bisa buat bahan pemilihan procie bagi yg masih newbie juga kaya gw.. cendol sent..

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bandung
    Posts
    341
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Perbandingan Performa E4300, E5200, E6600, Q6600 dan E8500



    Untung juga dulu pernah merasakan kegarangan E4500 dan E4600 keluarga dari si E4300... hebat begitu... jadi penasaran menarik E7200 ku ke 4.2GHz... P35 nya kuat gak ya...

    Terima kasih banyak infonya. Membantu menyadari kekuatan C2D dibanding si legenda Q6600. Gak jelek2 amat ternyata.


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ngayogyakarto Hadiningrat
    Posts
    4,173
    Thanks
    118
    Thanked 89 Times in 52 Posts
    Rep Power
    52

    Re: Perbandingan Performa E4300, E5200, E6600, Q6600 dan E8500



    menarik juga y...
    cendol sent

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Jakarta
    Posts
    768
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: Perbandingan Performa E4300, E5200, E6600, Q6600 dan E8500



    Quote Originally Posted by wac View Post
    Untung juga dulu pernah merasakan kegarangan E4500 dan E4600 keluarga dari si E4300... hebat begitu... jadi penasaran menarik E7200 ku ke 4.2GHz... P35 nya kuat gak ya...

    Terima kasih banyak infonya. Membantu menyadari kekuatan C2D dibanding si legenda Q6600. Gak jelek2 amat ternyata.
    Soalnya game2 yang dipake buat tes belum bisa memanfaatkan kemampuan Q6600 sepenuhnya bro. lain ceritanya kalo tes nya pake GTA 4


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts